Abstract
The present study aims to investigate the effect of extraction method on the recovery of flavonoid glycosides, antimicrobials and antioxidants from Ginkgo leaves collected from six different locations in Uttarakhand, Indian Himalaya. Four extraction methods, namely maceration, reflux, shaker and soxhlet were considered, where reflux extracts showed higher antimicrobial antioxidant activity and higher content of flavonoid glycosides. The reference standards of Ginkgo flavonoid glycosides (quercetin, kaempferol and isorhamnetin) and crude extracts were tested for their antimicrobial activity against gram positive and gram negative bacteria and fungi following disc diffusion method and minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC). All the test microorganisms were observed to be inhibited significantly by Ginkgo flavonoids in plate based assays. Correlation coefficients exhibited the extent of contribution of flavonoid glycosides in antimicrobial activity and confirmed the reflux method as a potential method for extraction. Moreover, antioxidant activity as measured by DPPH assay was also found to be higher in reflux method. Significant variation (p<0.05) in the flavonoid glycosides among the locations was also observed and sample collected from GB6 location was found to be the best for quercetin and isorhamnetin, while GB5 for kaempferol. Significant correlation (r<0.05, r<0.001) was obtained while developing the relationship between total flavonoid glycosides and antimicrobials. The present study, thus suggests the reflux method of extraction to be the best for maximum recovery of flavonoid glycosides with higher antioxidant and antimicrobial activities from Ginkgo extract.
Keywords: Ginkgo biloba, Flavonoid glycosides, Antimicrobials, Antioxidants, HPLC, Indian Himalaya
Graphical abstract
Open in a new tab
1. Introduction
Ginkgo biloba L. (common name-maiden hair tree; family- Ginkgoaceace) is a traditionally as well as economically important plant that is now cultivated in China, Japan, Korea, France, Germany and in some parts of India, especially in Uttarakhand state, for its aesthetic and the medicinal value.1 The medicinal parts of Ginkgo (fresh or dried leaves, and seeds separated from their fleshy outer layer) are known for antioxidant, antiasthamtic, wound healing, neuroprotective and antimicrobial properties and to improve the mental capacity in Alzheimer's patients.2, 3, 4 The medicinal and the antimicrobial properties of Ginkgo can be attributed to two important chemical constituents, viz. terpenes trilactone (ginkgolides and bilobalide) and flavonoid glycosides.5 Among other constituents, the flavonoids have received attention in medical research due to the various useful properties, including antiallergic, anti-inflammatory, antioxidants, antimicrobial and oestrogenic activities, enzyme inhibition, and vascular and cytotoxic antitumour activities.6
The flavonoids may occur in plants in the form of glycosides in several glycosidic combinations. However, an increase in the ratio of aglycones to glycosides in extracts is indicative of degradation. For this reason, hydrolysis has been used to release the aglycones in extracts that can be further investigated by HPLC.7Ginkgo flavanoid glycosides have been reported in the forms of mono-, di- and tri-sugar units of quercetin (Q), kaempferol (K) and isorhamnetin (I).8
Extraction of bioactive compounds, imparting antimicrobial activity, facilitates the pharmacology studies leading to the synthesis of more potent drugs with reduced toxicity.9 The term ‘antimicrobial’ refers to the inhibition of growth with respect to specific groups of microorganisms such as antibacterial, antifungal, antiviral and antiprotozoan. Most of the research related to Ginkgo leaf extracts involves either isolation of phytoconstituents or evaluation of pharmacological activities. However, very few studies regarding the correlation of biological activity with the isolated compounds are on record.10 Although, widespread research is in progress on the utilization of Ginkgo as an effective antioxidant, literature on the influence of different extraction methods on the flavonoid glycosides recovery and their antimicrobial and antioxidant activities is negligible. Therefore, the present study investigates the effect of different extraction methods on the antimicrobial, antioxidant, and the extraction yield in Ginkgo. The results obtained would help in determining the variation in flavonoids content, antioxidant and antimicrobial activities and selection of suitable extraction method for harnessing the potential of species in pharmaceutical purposes.
2. Material and methods
2.1. Plant material
Ginkgo biloba leaves were collected during rainy season from six locations in Uttarakhand, Indian Himalaya across an altitudinal gradient of (1200–2002 m amsl). The locations are referred as: GB1 (Kalika, Almora), GB2 (Chaubatia, Almora), GB3 (Snowview, Nainital), GB4 (Highcourt, Nainital), GB5 (Glenthorn, Nainital) and GB6 (GBPIHED, Almora). Leaf samples were dried at room temperature and were further grounded to fine powder using motor and pestle and stored at 4°C for further analysis in air tight zip lock bags.
2.2. Chemicals
Standard reference compounds of flavonoid (quercetin, kaempferol, isorhamnetin), p-iodo nitro tetrazolium were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich. Ethanol (EtOH), Orthophosphoric acid (H3PO4) and Hydrochloric acid (HCl) of analytical grade and Methanol of HPLC grade were obtained from Merck (Mumbai, India). All the extracts and solvents were filtered through 0.45μm membrane filter (Millipore). Growth media, Tryptone Yeast extract (TY) and Potato Dextrose (PD) was purchased from Hi media, India.
2.3. Extraction procedure
Four extraction methods (maceration, reflux, shaker, and soxhlet) were employed to obtain their respective extracts. In reflux method, extraction was performed with 3ml of conc HCl11 and 5mL of H2O for 2.5h. Soxhlet extraction was performed in the soxhlet apparatus for 6hat 60°C. Shaker extraction was performed at 200rpmat 25°C. The liquid extract obtained was then filtered through Whatman filter paper (no. 42). The extractions were carried out with the same solid to solvent ratio of 5g of the ground leaf sample to 50mL EtOH (99.7%, v/v). For maceration extraction, the extract was macerated overnight at room temperature. The supernatant of maceration, shaker and soxhlet was hydrolyzed by the reflux to detect the flavonoid glycosides in the HPLC. The final hydrolyzed filtrate was thereof filtered using Whatman filter paper (no. 42). The filtrate was concentrated using a rotary evaporator to obtain constant mass of respective macerated, reflux, soxhlet, and shaker extract. Concentrated extracts were dissolved in MeOH and sonicated for 15minat 40°C. The prepared samples were filtered through a 0.45μm filter prior to HPLC analysis and kept in air tight containers at 4°C until further analysis.
2.4. HPLC analysis
2.4.1. Standard solutions
Stock solutions 1mg/ml of quercetin, kaempferol, and isorhamnetin were prepared in methanol, and diluted to obtain the desired working concentrations in the quantification range. The calibration graphs were plotted after linear regression of the peak areas vs concentrations. All the reference standard solutions were stored at−20°C.
2.4.2. HPLC analysis and chromatographic conditions
HPLC analysis was performed with Chromatographic system (Merck-Hitachi, Japan) consisting of manual sampler with 20μL injector volume and an UV-VIS detector. The separation was performed on C18 column at ambient temperature. The elution was performed by using isocratic mode with mobile phase (0.05% H3PO4/MeOH 50:50)11 and a flow rate of 0.8mL/min at 32°C. The samples were run for 40minat wavelength of 360nm. The identification of flavonoid glycoside compounds was done with respect to retention time of corresponding external standards. The mean value of content was calculated with ± standard error. The results are expressed as mg/100g dry weight.
2.5. Determination of antimicrobial and antioxidant activity
2.5.1. Test microorganisms
The test microorganisms were taken from the Microbial Culture Collection established in the Microbiology Lab of the Institute. The microbial cultures were represented by gram negative and gram positive bacteria and fungi. The bacterial cultures were maintained on TY agar slants at 4°C and also in glycerol stocks at−20°C, while the fungal cultures were maintained on PD agar slants at 4°C. The extracts and standard flavonoid glycosides were individually tested against different bacteria and fungi including Bacillus subtilis (NRRL B-30408), Micrococcus roseus (MTCC8133), Pseudomonas putida (MTCC6842), Serratia marcescens (MTCC4822), Fusarium oxysporum (ITCC4219) and Trametes hirsuta (MTCC11397). The test microorganisms were obtained from the Microbial culture collection that has been established in the Microbiology Lab of the Institute (GBPNIHESD). These cultures have also been accessioned in National/International depositories. The accession details are: Bacillus subtilis (NRRL B-30408) with Agricultural Research Service (ARS) patent culture collection, United States Department of agriculture, Illinois; Micrococcus roseus (MTCC8133), Pseudomonas putida (MTCC6842), Serratia marcescens (MTCC4822) and Trametes hirsuta (MTCC11397) with Microbial Type Culture Collection and Gene Bank, Institute of Microbial Technology, Chandigarh, India and Fusarium oxysporum (ITCC4219) with Indian Type Indian Type Culture Collection, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
2.5.2. Disc diffusion assay
The antimicrobial activity assays were performed following agar disc diffusion method. The test organisms i.e. bacteria were inoculated in TY and fungi in PD broth in conical flasks, and incubated at 25°C for 24h. Simultaneously, TY and PD agar plates were prepared for performing the assays. For testing the antimicrobial activity against the test microorganisms, 25μl of microbial suspension was inoculated over the agar, spreading uniformly using a glass spreader. Five mm filter paper discs (Whatman paper no. 42), carrying 15μl suspension of leaf extract were placed on agar surface inoculated with the individual microorganisms. The plates were incubated at 25°C for 120h; observations were recorded by measuring the zone of inhibition against the test microorganisms.
2.5.3. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC)
The MIC of Ginkgo leaf extracts was determined following Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute methodology.12, 13 Dilutions, ranging from 9 to 0.100mg/ml of leaf extracts were prepared in tubes, including one growth control (medium+test organism), and one sterility control (medium+test extracts). The final concentration of microbial culture adjusted to 1.5×105CFU/mL (optical density 0.1at 600nm), was then inoculated in different tubes (9–0.100mg/ml) containing leaf extract and incubated at 25°C. The MIC values were recorded following addition (40μL) of 0.2mg/mL p-iodonitrotetrazolium chloride and incubation at 25°C for 1–4h, depending upon the microorganism. Viable microorganisms reduced the yellow dye to pink colour. MIC defined as the lowest concentration that prevented this change and showing absence of growth in the tubes. This was further confirmed by plating on the respective media.
2.5.4. DPPH radical scavenging assay
The scavenging activity in leaf extracts was evaluated using DPPH assay.14 The results are expressed as mg ascorbic acid/g dry leaves powder. The leaf extracts in the concentration range 9–0.100mg/ml were prepared. Aliquot (1mL) of extract solution was combined with 2mL methanol and then to 0.25mL of a 1mM ethanolic solution of DPPH. The mixture vortexed (1min) and then left to stand at room temperature (20min). Absorbance was measured at 517nm. Reference sample was prepared with methanol instead of DPPH and the control instead of the extract sample. The free radical scavenging activity of each sample and reference standard was determined as per cent of the inhibition obtained from the following formula:
% inhibition=100x (Absorbance blank-Absorbance sample)/Absorbance blank
IC50 value (mg/mL) is the inhibitory concentration at which DPPH radicals were scavenged by 50 % and was obtained by interpolation from linear regression analysis.
2.6. Statistical analysis
All the experiments were performed in triplicates. Means and standard errors for each sample were calculated. Analysis of variance among means was tested using two way ANOVA (SPSS version 16). Significance level was determined (p<0.05) and significant difference was separated using Duncan's multiple Range Test (DMRT).
3. Results
3.1. Effect of extraction methods on the recovery of flavonoid glycosides
The three flavonoid glycosides in Ginkgo leaf extracts varied with respect to the extraction methods (Fig.1). The reflux extracts showed the highest recovery of quercetin, kaempferol, and isorhamnetin (117.791, 136.915, and 107.265mg/100g dw, respectively), while the lowest values were recorded in the macerated extracts (Fig.2). The total flavonoid glycosides content (quercetin+kaempferol+isorhamnetin) from the six locations varied significantly (p<0.05) with respect to extraction methods. The recovery of total flavonoid glycosides content during all the extraction methods was in an order of reflux>maceration>soxhlet (Table1). However, in case of the orbital shaker method the concentration of Ginkgo flavonoid glycosides was not detectable.
Fig.1.
Fig.2.
Open in a new tab
Table1.
Variation in concentration of total flavonoid glycosides with different extraction method and location.
| Locations | Extraction Methods (mg/100g dw) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Maceration | Reflux | Soxhlet | |
| GB1 | 7.210±0.216f | 71.097±0.847d | 8.493±0.538d |
| GB2 | 9.961±0.110e | 59.942±0.557e | 8.566±0.050d |
| GB3 | 15.402±0.334d | 51.906±0.174f | 16.748±0.319c |
| GB4 | 24.665±1.068c | 107.380±0.164c | 29.631±0.144a |
| GB5 | 30.699±0.512b | 123.640±0.344b | 29.605±0.488a |
| GB6 | 36.213±1.217a | 134.240±0.383a | 27.224±0.034b |
| Total | 20.692±2.597 | 91.367±7.730 | 20.045±2.241 |
| f- value | 268.054 | 5414 | 937.766 |
Open in a new tab
Values are mean±standard error; GB1, Kalika; GB2, Chaubatia; GB3, Snowview; GB4, Highcourt; GB5; Glenthorn; GB6, GBPIHED, Kosi; mean values followed by the same latter(s) in a column are not significantly different (p<0.05) based on DMRT.
The quantity of different flavonoid glycosides also varied significantly (p<0.05) among the locations with respect to extraction method (Fig.3A–C). The quercetin and kaempferol content of maceration extracts (Fig.3A) were higher in GB5 (38.70 and 68.47mg/100g dw) while isorhamnetin was higher in GB6 (46.68mg/100g dw), minimum content was estimated in GB1 location (quercetin (9.75mg/100g dw), kaempferol (6.10mg/100g dw), and isorhamnetin (11.98mg/100g dw)). In case of reflux extracts (Fig.3B) the quercetin (181.89mg/100g dw) and isorhamnetin (167.03mg/100g dw) was higher in GB6 and kaempferol content was higher in GB5 (194.46mg/100g dw) location. Minimum content of quercetin (72.16mg/100g dw) and isorhamnetin (50.00mg/100g dw) was estimated in GB3, while kaempferol (69.43mg/100g dw) was minimum in GB2 location. In case of soxhlet extraction (Fig.3C), the quercetin content (15.55mg/100g dw) was higher in GB6 and lowest in GB2 location (2.96mg/100g dw). The kaempferol was higher in GB4 (61.89mg/100g dw) and GB1 (63.32mg/100g dw) locations and isorhamnetin in GB4 (38.58mg/100g dw). The lowest kaempferol content was estimated in GB1 (22.12mg/100g dw) and GB2 (22.56mg/100g dw) and isorhamnetin in GB2 (6.74mg/100g dw) location.
Fig.3.
Open in a new tab
3.2. Effect of extraction methods on antimicrobial and antioxidant properties of Ginkgo flavanoid glycosides
Regarding the antimicrobial activity of 3 major Ginkgo flavonoid glycosides (quercetin, kaempferol, isorhamnetin and mixture of all three), the zone of inhibition for mixture ranged between 2-5mm, while for isorhamnetin, quercetin and kaempferol it was recorded between 1.0-2.47mm, 1.0–2.67mm and 1.0–1.93mm, respectively (Table2a and Fig.4), hence, the mixture showing highest antimicrobial activity (synergistic) for all the test microorganisms. Quercetin and isorhamnetin exhibited the highest zone of inhibition against B.subtilis, while F.oxysporum was inhibited maximum by quercetin and kaempferol. Kaempferol showed maximum activity against P.putida, while isorhamnetin had highest zone of inhibition for M.roseus and S.marcescens. The mixture had highest zone of inhibition for B.subtilis and P.putida.
Table2a.
Disc diffusion assay for the determination of antimicrobial activity of standard compounds and their mixture.
| Microorganisms | Zone of inhibition (mm) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quercetin | Kaempferol | Isorhamnetin | Mixture | |
| Bacillus subtilis | 2.67±0.33 | 1.33±0.58 | 2.47±0.33 | 5.00±0.00 |
| Micrococcus roseus | 2.33±0.33 | 1.00±0.33 | 2.00±0.33 | 4.00±0.57 |
| Pesudomanas putida | 1.67±0.33 | 1.37±0.33 | 2.33±0.33 | 5.00±0.00 |
| Serratia marcescens | 2.00±0.00 | 1.93±0.33 | 2.00±0.33 | 4.33±0.00 |
| Fusarium oxysporum | 2.33±0.33 | 1.67±0.33 | 1.00±0.00 | 3.00±0.00 |
| Trametes hirsuta | 1.00±0.00 | 1.33±0.33 | 1.00±0.00 | 2.00±0.00 |
Open in a new tab
Values are mean±standard error (n=3).
Fig.4.
Open in a new tab
Antimicrobial activity in Ginkgo leaf extracts was also found to be affected by the type of extraction method (Table2b and Fig.4). Among the 4 methods used, the reflux crude extracts from all different locations exhibited highest inhibition against the test microorganisms followed by maceration, soxhelt and shaker methods, respectively, with reflux extracts showing inhibition zone ranging from 1.67±0.33 to 7.33±0.33mm. The crude extracts had highest antimicrobial activity against the Gram+ve bacteria (B.subtilis) followed by Gram –ve bacteria (P.putida) and fungi. Further, correlation analysis (Table3) revealed that zone of inhibition of standards mixture and all plant crude extracts activity was positively correlated with each other's (p<0.01). Isorhamnetin inhibition activity was also correlated with the Ginkgo plant crude extracts activity (p<0.01, p<0.05). In MIC experiments, the reflux extracts showed the lowest inhibitory concentration against all the test microorganisms with the lowest value (0.183mg/mL) in case of B.subtilis and the highest (0.300mg/mL) in case of F.oxysporum (Table4). As displayed in Table5, the value for the antioxidant activity showed wide variability ranging between 0.325mg/mL (reflux extract) and 6.5mg/mL (shaker) by DPPH assay.
Table2b.
Disc diffusion assay for the determination of antimicrobial activity of Ginkgo plants.
| Microorganisms | Zone of inhibition (mm) | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GB1 | GB2 | GB3 | ||||||||||
| Mac | Ref | Sha | Sox | Mac | Ref | Sha | Sox | Mac | Ref | Sha | Sox | |
| B.subtilis | 4.33±0.67 | 6.67±0.58 | 4.33±0.33 | 4.33±0.33 | 4.00±0.33 | 6.67±0.33 | 4.27±0.00 | 5.33±0.33 | 5.33±0.33 | 6.33±0.33 | 4.00±0.00 | 5.33±0.33 |
| M.roseus | 3.00±0.00 | 5.67±0.33 | 4.00±0.33 | 4.00±0.00 | 2.33±0.33 | 5.33±0.33 | 3.67±0.58 | 4.33±0.58 | 3.67±0.33 | 6.00±0.00 | 5.00±0.00 | 5.00±0.58 |
| P.putida | 2.67±0.33 | 5.00±0.58 | 4.67±0.00 | 4.00±0.33 | 3.67±0.33 | 4.67±0.67 | 4.33±0.33 | 2.33±0.67 | 1.67±0.33 | 4.67±0.67 | 3.00±0.00 | 4.67±0.33 |
| S.marcescens | 2.00±0.00 | 4.00±0.58 | 3.67±0.33 | 3.00±0.33 | 2.67±0.33 | 5.67±0.33 | 3.00±1.00 | 4.00±0.33 | 2.00±0.00 | 4.33±0.67 | 2.67±0.33 | 3.67±0.33 |
| F.oxysporum | 0.00 | 1.67±0.33 | 0.67±0.33 | 1.67±0.33 | 2.00±0.00 | 2.00±0.00 | 1.67±0.58 | 1.33±0.33 | 2.00±0.33 | 2.67±0.00 | 1.67±0.33 | 0.67±0.33 |
| T.hirsuta | 1.67±0.33 | 2.33±0.33 | 1.00±0.00 | 1.33±0.58 | 2.00±0.00 | 3.00±0.33 | 2.67±1.00 | 1.00±0..58 | 0.00 | 3.00±0.00 | 1.67±0.33 | 1.00±0.00 |
| Microorganisms | GB4 | GB5 | GB6 | |||||||||
| Mac | Ref | Sha | Sox | Mac | Ref | Sha | Sox | Mac | Ref | Sha | Sox | |
| B.subtilis | 5.00±0.00 | 7.33±0.00 | 4.57±0.00 | 5.67±0.00 | 5.67±0.33 | 6.67±0.33 | 4.00±0.00 | 5.00±0.00 | 3.33±0.33 | 7.00±0.33 | 4.00±0.00 | 4.00±0.00 |
| M.roseus | 3.33±0.33 | 5.00±0.58 | 4.33±0.33 | 4.57±0.33 | 3.90±0.58 | 6.33±0.33 | 4.00±0.58 | 5.00±0.00 | 3.33±0.33 | 5.33±0.67 | 4.67±0.33 | 4.67±0.33 |
| P.putida | 4.00±0.00 | 4.67±0.33 | 4.00±0.58 | 4.00±0.33 | 3.75±0.33 | 4.67±0.33 | 2.67±0.00 | 3.67±0.33 | 3.67±0.33 | 5.00±0.00 | 4.00±0.00 | 3.67±0.33 |
| S.marcescens | 3.00±0.00 | 4.33±0.33 | 4.33±0.33 | 3.00±0.67 | 3.33±0.67 | 5.00±0.00 | 3.33±0.33 | 3.67±0.33 | 2.67±0.33 | 4.33±0.33 | 3.67±0.33 | 4.00±0.00 |
| F.oxysporum | 2.00±0.58 | 2.67±0.33 | 2.67±0.67 | 2.00±0.00 | 2.67±0.58 | 3.67±0.58 | 2.00±0.33 | 2.00±0.00 | 0.00 | 2.33±0.00 | 0.00 | 2.33±0.33 |
| T.hirsuta | 2.33±0.33 | 3.33±0.33 | 1.15±0.33 | 3.33±0.33 | 3.00±0.33 | 2.33±0.67 | 1.67±0.00 | 2.67±0.33 | 2.33±0.67 | 3.67±0.58 | 2.00±0.00 | 2.33±0.33 |
Open in a new tab
Values are mean±standard error (n=3); GB1, Kalika; GB2, Chaubatia; GB3, Snowview; GB4, Highcourt; GB5; Glenthorn; GB6, GBPIHED, Kosi; Mac, Maceration; Ref, Reflux; Sha, Shaker; Sox, Soxhlet.
Table3.
Correlation coefficients among Quercetin, Kampferol, Isorhamnetin, mixture of all three standards and Ginkgo plants reflux extracts with respect to different microorganisms antimicrobial activity.
| Antimicrobial activity of different microorganisms | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standards | Crude reflux extracts | |||||||||
| Quercetin | Kaempferol | Isorhamnetin | Mixture | GB1 | GB2 | GB3 | GB4 | GB5 | GB6 | |
| Quercetin | 1 | |||||||||
| Kaempferol | 0.234 | 1 | ||||||||
| Isorhamnetin | 0.339 | 0.483* | 1 | |||||||
| Mixture | 0.577* | 0.451 | 0.609** | 1 | ||||||
| GB1 | 0.356 | 0.3290 | 0.702** | 0.831** | 1 | |||||
| GB2 | 0.335 | 0.359 | 0.780** | 0.691** | 0.904** | 1 | ||||
| GB3 | 0.201 | 0.146 | 0.570* | 0.744** | 0.874** | 0.760** | 1 | |||
| GB4 | 0.326 | 0.334 | 0.776** | 0.733** | 0.802** | 0.802** | 0.787** | 1 | ||
| GB5 | 0.492* | 0.377 | 0.849** | 0.775** | 0.860** | 0.865** | 0.727** | 0.807** | 1 | |
| GB6 | 0.472* | 0.192 | 0.755** | 0.709** | 0.819** | 0.796** | 0.765** | 0.897** | 0.862** | 1 |
Open in a new tab
Level of significance: *- p<0.05; **-p<0.01.
Table4.
Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of Ginkgo different extracts.
| Microorganisms | MIC (mg/ml) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maceration | Reflux | Shaker | Soxhlet | |
| Bacillus subtilis | 0.300 | 0.183 | 0.500 | 0.500 |
| Micrococcus roseus | 0.750 | 0.216 | 0.600 | 0.500 |
| Pesudomanas putida | 0.500 | 0.250 | 0.500 | 0.400 |
| Serratia marcescens | 0.500 | 0.283 | 0.500 | 0.500 |
| Fusarium oxysporum | 0.800 | 0.300 | 0.600 | 0.600 |
| Trametes hirsute | 0.850 | 0.290 | 0.650 | 0.700 |
Open in a new tab
MIC, minimum inhibitory concentration.
Table5.
Antioxidant activity of the Ginkgo leaf extracts determined IC50 DPPH values.
| Samples | IC50 (mg/ml) |
|---|---|
| Maceration | 6.00 |
| Reflux | 0.325 |
| Shaker | 6.500 |
| Soxhlet | 1.200 |
Open in a new tab
3.3. Factorial analysis and relationship between total flavonoid glycosides and antimicrobial activity against test microorganisms
Factorial analysis revealed that the location and the method of extraction, individually and in interaction, significantly (P<0.05) affects the recovery of quercetin, kaempferol and isorhamentin from crude extracts with highest f value, ranging from 250.45 to 794.07 (Table6). The linear regression analysis revealed that total flavonoid glycosides contribute 5.42–50.35% of antimicrobial activity against test microorganisms (r2=0.503 for B.subtilis, 0.097 for M.roseus, 0.333 for P.putida, 0.257 for S.marcescens, 0.054 for F.oxysporum and 0.256 for T.hirsuta) (Fig.5A–F).
Table6.
Analysis of variance for determination of the effect of location, methods and their interaction on flavonoid glycosides in Ginkgo leaf extracts.
| Source of variation | DF | Flavonoid glycosides | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quercetin | Kaempferol | Isorhamnetin | |||||
| MS | f value | MS | f value | MS | f value | ||
| Location (L) | 5 | 3543.53 | 1.94*** | 10480.43 | 1.63*** | 4045.21 | 1.67*** |
| Extraction methods (E) | 2 | 62846.77 | 3.44*** | 53654.78 | 8.34*** | 46271.19 | 1.91*** |
| L x E | 10 | 1449.80 | 794.07*** | 1610.59 | 250.45*** | 1302.12 | 539.26*** |
| Error | 36 | 1.83 | 6.43 | 2.41 | |||
Open in a new tab
DF, degree of freedom; MS mean of sum; Level of significance *** p<0.05.
Fig.5.
Open in a new tab
4. Discussion
Although flavonoid glycosides have been reported to vary with age, altitude, environmental factors, the extraction yield, antimicrobial and antioxidant activity has been reported to vary with the method of extraction15 and selection of solvents. Best bioactivity of Ginkgo has been reported from methanol extracts.3 In concurrence, Boonkaew and Camper16 reported absence of inhibitory activity against E.coli in leaf and root tissue methnolic extracts of Ginkgo, whereas the extracts from leaf and root derived callus inhibited the growth of Klebsiela pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus sp., and Streptococcus pyogenes. Selection of suitable extraction method has been emphasized with respect to the biological activities.17 In Ginkgo, methods namely simulated digestion process, microwave extraction, soxhlet, maceration ultrasound assisted extraction and orbital shaker have been used for recovery of flavonoids.15, 18 The present study finds the effect of extraction on the recovery of flavonoids with an influence on antimicrobial and antioxidant activities. The reflux extracts with higher recovery, antimicrobial potential against all the test microorganisms and antioxidant activity can be further attributed to the higher content of flavonoid glycosides in reflux extracts. The maximum recovery from reflux extracts could be due to the maximum hydrolysis of flavonoid glycosides content from the aglycone concentration,19 requiring shorter time for extraction in comparison to other methods.
In the present study, orbital shaker method was not found suitable for the extraction of Ginkgo flavonoid glycosides which might be due to the long extraction time with fewer yields as compared to reflux method. The hot solvent systems under reflux condition are likely to be more efficient for the recovery of Ginkgo flavonoid glycosides offering higher extraction yield and antimicrobial and antioxidant activities. These observations are in agreement with the earlier findings of Kaur etal.15 that reported the higher efficiency of reflux with 60 % aqueous ethanol in comparison to maceration, ultrasound/orbital shaker and microwave methods with respect to the extraction of flavonoid glycosides from Ginkgo. This can be further associated to an effective extraction under reflux conditions leading to higher release of some bound phenolics. The individual quercetin, kaempferol and isorhamentin content in Ginkgo leaves, in the present study, have been found on the higher side in different extracts (5.85–68.47mg/100g dw in maceration, 69.43–194.46mg/100g dw in reflux and 2.96–61.31mg/100g dw in soxhlet) in comparison to the earlier report from Poland from green Ginkgo leaves.20 In the cited study, the kaempferol, myricetin, and isorhamnetin content predominated in general and ranged from 153 to 661μg/gdm. extract.
Regarding the antimicrobial activity of Ginkgo, the reflux extracts showed higher inhibitory effect on the test microorganisms. The synergistic action of mixture of all the three standards (quercetin, kaempferol and isorhamentin) was also measured higher in comparison to individual compounds observed in terms of formation of inhibition zone. The importance of synergistic action of distinct classes of chemical compounds imparting pharmacological activities have been highlighted in many studies. For instance, Tao etal.21 reported the antibacterial/antifungal activities and synergistic interaction from Ginkgo leaves lipids against Salmonella enterica, Staphylococcus aureus and Aspergillus niger. It is also possible that flavonoid glycosides act in synergy with other polyphenols to boost their antimicrobial activity.22
Individual compounds have also been screened against variety of microorganisms. In the present study, the individual compounds querectin, kaempferol and isorhmnetin were found to be active against B. subtilis, M. roseus, P. putida, S. marcescens, F. oxysporum, T. hirsuta; querectin being more active against all the microorganisms in comparison to isorhmnetin and kaempferol, respectively. Lee and Kim23 reported Ginkgo kaempferol and quercetin to be active against Clostridium perfringens and Escherichia coli, however, it did not inhibit the anaerobic intestinal and lactic acid bacteria. Choi etal.24 investigated the alklyphenols and ginkgolic acid of Ginkgo and showed the antimicrobial activity against S.aureus, Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus sp. Fazal etal.25 reported the antibacterial activity of Ginkgo leaf extracts against 6 bacteria along with the absence of inhibition in case of B.subtilis and E.coli. In the present study, all the Ginkgo leaf extracts obtained from different methods from different locations exhibited strong inhibition of B.subtilis. The sensitivity of gram positive bacteria in comparison to the gram negative to the antimicrobials can be attributed to the lipopolysaccharides found in the outer membrane of the gram-negative bacteria that contribute to the inherent resistance to external agents, such as hydrophilic dyes, antibiotics and detergents.26
In the present study the MIC values ranged from 0.183 to 0.850mg/ml, lowest being in reflux extract. These results are in line with that of the antimicrobial activity (disc diffusion method) with respect to the three groups of microorganisms. The antioxidant activity of the plant extracts vary according to plant species, geographical and climatic factors.27 The antioxidant properties of Ginkgo are attributed to the phenolic compounds and flavonoid glycosides in the extracts.15, 28 Sati etal.29 have reported the positive correlation between phenolic and flavonoid content and the antioxidant activity. In the present study, antioxidant activity results expressed high flavonoid glycosides in the reflux extracts moderately to highly associate with the antioxidant property.
5. Conclusion
The present study concludes the importance of various procedures in extraction of flavonoid glycosides and determination of antimicrobial and antioxidant activities in Ginkgo leaf extracts from different location. The reflux method was the most efficient extraction method for recovery of flavonoid glycosides and also for obtaining the higher antimicrobial and antioxidant activities. The synergistic action of all the 3 individual compounds (querectin, kaempferol and isorhmnetin) showed higher antimicrobial activity as compared to individual compounds. Further research is needed to identify the mechanism of antimicrobial action of Ginkgo flavonoid glycosides.
Conflict of interest
All authors have none to declare.
Acknowledgements
Director, GB Pant National Institute of Himalayan Environment and Sustainable Development, Almora is thanked for extending the facilities. Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (No.: 09/560/(0017)/2013/EMR-I) and Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change, Govt. of India are gratefully acknowledged for financial support.
Footnotes
Peer review under responsibility of The Center for Food and Biomolecules, National Taiwan University.
References
- 1.Singh B., Kaur P., Gopichand Singh RD., Ahuja P.S. Biology and chemistry of Ginkgo biloba. Fitoterapia. 2008;79:401–418. doi: 10.1016/j.fitote.2008.05.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Mazzanti G., Mascellino M.T., Battinelli L., Coluccia D., Manganaro M., Saso L. Antimicrobial investigation of semipurified fractions of Ginkgo biloba leaves. JEthnopharmacol. 2000;71:83–88. doi: 10.1016/s0378-8741(99)00179-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Sati P., Pandey A., Palni L.M.S. Antimicrobial potential of leaf extracts of Ginkgo biloba L., growing in Uttarakhand, India. Natl Acad Sci Lett. 2012;35:201–206. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Xu S.L., Choi R.C.Y., Zhu K.Y. Isorhamnetin, a flavonol aglycone from Ginkgo biloba L., induces neuronal differentiation of cultured PC12 cells: potentiating the effect of nerve growth factor. JEvid Based Complement Altern Med. 2012 doi: 10.1155/2012/278273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.van Beek T.A., Montoro P. Chemical analysis and quality control of Ginkgo biloba leaves, extracts and phytopharmaceuticals. JChromatogr A. 2009;1216:2002–2032. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2009.01.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Cushnie T.P.T., Lamb A.J. Antimicrobial activity of flavonoids. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2005;26:343–356. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2005.09.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Sticher O., Meier P., Hasler A. In: Ginkgo Biloba. The Analysis of Ginkgo Flavonoids. Van Beek T.A., editor. Harwood; Amsterdam: 2000. p. 179. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Hasler A., Sticher O. Identification and determination of the flavonoids from Ginkgo biloba by high performance liquid chromatography. JChromatogr A. 1992;605:41–48. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Ebana R.U.B., Madunagu B.E., Ekpe E.D., Otung I.N. Microbiological exploitation of cardiac glycoside and alkaloids from Garcinia kola, Borreria ocymoides, Kola nitida and Citrus aurantifolia. JAppl Biotechnol. 1991;71:398–401. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1991.tb03807.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Bedir E.T., Khan R.A., Zhao J. Biologically active secondary metabolites from Ginkgo biloba. JAgri Food Chem. 2002;50:3150–3155. doi: 10.1021/jf011682s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Kaur P., Chaudhary A., Singh R.D., Prasad G.R.P., Singh B. Spatial and temporal variation of secondary metabolite profiles in Ginkgo biloba leaves. Chem Biodivers. 2012;9:409–417. doi: 10.1002/cbdv.201100082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Clinical and laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) Sixth Edition. M7-A6; Wayne: 2005. Methods for Dilution Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria that Grow Aerobically. Approved Standard- [Google Scholar]
- 13.Clinical and laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) Third Edition. M27-A3; Wayne: 2008. Reference Method for Broth Dilution Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Yeasts. Approved Standard- [Google Scholar]
- 14.Wong S.P., Leong L.P., Koh J.H.W. Antioxidant activities of aqueous extracts of selected plants. Food Chem. 2006;99(4):775–783. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kaur P., Chaudhary A., Singh B. Gopichand. An efficient microwave assisted extraction of phenolic compounds and antioxidant potential Ginkgo biloba. Natl Product Commun. 2012;7:203–206. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Boonkaew T., Camper N.D. Biological activities of Ginkgo extracts. Phytomedicine. 2005;12:318–323. doi: 10.1016/j.phymed.2003.06.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Hayouni E.A., Abedrabba M., Bouix M., Hamdi M. The effects of solvents and extraction method on the phenolic contents and biological activities invitro of Tunisian Quercus coccifera L. and Juniperus phoenicea L. fruit extracts. Food Chem. 2007;105:1126–1134. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Goh L.M.L., Barlow P.J. Flavonoid recovery and stability from Ginkgo biloba subjected to a simulated digestion process. Food Chem. 2004;86:195–202. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Tang D., Yang D., Tang A. Simultaneous chemical fingerprint and quantitative analysis of Ginkgo biloba extract by HPLC-DAD. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2010;396:3087–3095. doi: 10.1007/s00216-010-3536-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Kobus J., Flaczyk E., Siger A., Nogala-Kałucka M., Korczak J., Pegg R.B. Phenolic compounds and antioxidant activity of extracts of Ginkgo leaves. Eur J Lipid Sci Technol. 2009;111:1150–1160. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Tao R., Wang C.Z., Kong Z.W. Antibacterial/antifungal activity and synergistic interactions betwen polyprenols and other lipids isolated from Ginkgo biloba L. leaves. Molecules. 2013;18:216–2182. doi: 10.3390/molecules18022166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Rauha J.P., Remes S., Heinonen M. Antimicrobial effects of Finnish plant extracts containing flavonoids and other phenolic compounds. Int J Food Microbiol. 2000;56:3–12. doi: 10.1016/s0168-1605(00)00218-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Lee H.S., Kim M. Selective responses of three Ginkgo biloba leaf-derived constituents on human intestinal bacteria. JAgric Food Chem. 2002;50:1840–1844. doi: 10.1021/jf011140a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Choi J.G., Jeong S.I., Ku C.S. Antibacterial activity of hydroxyalkenyl salicylic acids from sarcotesta of Ginkgo biloba against vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus. Fitoterapia. 2009;80:18–20. doi: 10.1016/j.fitote.2008.09.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Fazal H., Ahmad N., Ullah I. Antibacterial potential in Parthenium hysterophorus, Stevia rebaudiana and Ginkgo biloba. Pak J Bot. 2011;43:1307–1313. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Negi P.S., Jayaprakasha G.K., Rao L.J.M., Sakariah K.K. Antibacterial activity of turmeric oil- A byproduct from curcumin manufacture. JAgric Food Chem. 1999;47:4297–4300. doi: 10.1021/jf990308d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Perry N.B., Anderson R.E., Brennan N.J. Essential oils from Dalmation sage (Salvia officinalis L.): variations among individuals, plant parts, seasons and sites. JAgric Food Chem. 1999;47:2048–2054. doi: 10.1021/jf981170m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Maltas E., Vural H.C., Yildiz S. Antioxidant activity and fatty acid composition of Ginkgo biloba from Turkey. JFood Biochem. 2011;35:803–818. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Sati P., Pandey A., Rawat S., Rani A. Phytochemicals and antioxidants in leaf extracts of Ginkgo biloba with reference to location, seasonal variation and solvent system. JPharm Res. 2013;7:804–809. [Google Scholar]
